HardTalk News (Time for reflection)












































































  Home About Us Muslim Ummah ITG Newsletter AL-Khilafah Dawa Usul-Ul-Fiqh Links Itefaq Website
SELECT:   
 

Don't be Pakistani, be Muslim!!

Why are the Muslims in Pakistan being forced to choose between Allah(swt) and Political groups such as PPP, MQM and Muslim League-Nawaz party - those that represent anti-Islamic policies and only want to cheapen Pakistans Natural resources?

No Mosque or Charitable Organisation are permitted to collect Zakaht? - Why not?
Why are mosques, hospitals and charitable organisations worldwide not permitted to collected Zakaht?
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

We look into the reasons behind the Zakaht scandal, where Mosques, organizations and online website's are collecting Zakaht when they are not permitted to do so as clearly specified in the Qur'an.

It is unknown to a majority of Muslims that collection of zakaht is only permissible by those who are defined as the collectors of zakaht in the Qur'an. The Qur'an also defines who collects and distributes the zakaht and these collectors cannot be reinvented. The collectors are the appointed delegates of the TRUE Islamic state, its head of state being the Khaleefah and his appointed delegates. The collected zakaht is held in the batl mal (TRUE Islamic bank) and is distributed by the Khaleefah's delegates to the eight clearly defined receivers of the zakaht in the Qur'an. It should be noted that so far we have not mentioned any direct references to the Qur'an, read on and you will be given undeniable proof.

PLEASE DO NOT GIVE YOUR ZAKAHT TO WEBSITES THAT TRY TO CONVINCE YOU TO PART WITH YOUR MONEY ON-LINE. EVERYONE OF THEM ARE NOT AUTHORISED. ** BEWARE **

Mosques cover-up
We sent a brother to a mosque in East London and another to North London to find out what the mosques view were on collecting Zakaht. We were not surprised to find that both mosques had labled box's with the words "Zakaht" on them and as such where acting as collectors. When our appointed brothers enquired, what they were doing was unauthorized, both high ranking members of the mosque became confrontational over the meer suggestion. When asked for evidences, they had none, one did say, "Who else will collect it"? It seems that collection of zakaht in many cases finds its way to family members of the mosque comity overseas, and this selective distribution to the poor, sometimes for political reasons is their answer to the growing problem of who collects and distributes the zakaht?. It is another indication that muslims are trying to fit Islamic principles into an un-islamic world outlook, this must stop!

Charitable organisations are part of the global problem
You may think that you are helping others by giving your Zakaht and Sadqah to organisations that provide a little food or drinking water to the poor. But you are in fact helping the master beat the slave further. Lets explain this concept in another way. The Muslim countries have illegitimate governments and these governments oppress the muslims in many ways, whether it be social, economic or through political means. By sending monies to charitable organisations, this inefect helps these governments and provides them much needed relief. You wouldn't want to send money to aid the oppressor? Would you? It is very important to note that it is not permitted for Muslims to provide their zakaht to charitable organisations in the first place. [Read Article {PDF}] [To learn more read the VIP List]

You may question - "What about the people who need it?". They do indeed need financial support ,but you as a Muslim are not permitted to give your zakaht to false collectors such as charitable organisations or mosques. You are obliged and it is FARD for every adult muslim to calculate their zakaht and provide the zakaht to the eight people defined in the Qur'an as receivers. Read on and we will show you who those eight are and how you will provide your calculated zakaht to them. (Please note that the ITG do not collect Zakaht)

The Importance of calculating the correct Zakaht?
A student who has very limited income, may after claculation pay a Zakaht amount of less than 20p, yes twenty pence! Don't be surprised. Zakaht is not a tax, it is an obligation for those who have an income and it must be calculated correctly. Lets consider a Muslim cannot just say, "I am sending £2,000 Zakaht", this is very wrong and brings about competition on one hand and corruption on the other. In fact this person did not give Zakaht at all, he did not calculatie the correct amount of Zakaht making the money a Sadqah amount and the Zakaht is still owing on the neck of the Muslim for non-payment. So why boast, why not claculate the correct amount and please Allah(swt). Calculate the Zakaht and receive not only rewards for the effort but also for setting an example that Muslims can follow, that which Allah(swt) has prescribed to Muhammad(saaw). It is very easy to calculate the Zakaht amount and can be done by downloading the Zakaht Calculator spreadsheet. [Zakaht Calculator].

Example 1: a Wealthy man who owns a manson, has ten employees working for him, has three major projects that involve large sums of his own money is required to include in his liabilities all costs that allow him to run his household, pay wages and all expenditures for the year. This amount is taken away from his NET income and what's left is where 2.5% of Zakaht payable. Gold and precious metals, including gifts are exempt from Zakaht. Also, any charitable payments are considered expenditures and must be deducted from the calculations. A £1m income may need £800,000 expenditure to run leaving £200,000 of which 2.5% equals £5000 to pay as Zakaht. Remember that this example is for a wealthy individual and further deduction would be in order if we were to take into account the money he gives to his children and spouse. The next example is a better one for those with an average income:

Example 2: a family man who earns £40,000 a year, has a mortgage on his house of £200,000 and has total expenditure of £31,000 (mortgage payments, council tax, fuel costs, transportation cost for children, food and clothing costs, etc.) after deductions he is left with £9,000. Now, 2,5% of £9,000 comes to £255, but consider this, if his expenditure includes a £2,500 bill for renovations to his home or the purchase of a car this will leave £6,500. Now, 2.5% of £6,500 becomes £162.50 Zakaht payable. Lets consider further, he puts away as a gift for his Son or Daughters medical school fees at £2000 a year. Now, 2.5% of £4,500 becomes £112.50. This amount you pay and you know it has been calculated and is correct. Every individuals circumstances are different so you cannot do direct comparisons, nor are you allowed to do this in public. Always be mindful that you as an individual are not bank rolling the Muslim Ummah, this is the function of the World Islamic Government (the main collector of mineral wealth and Zakaht resources). The next question is could you be paying too much Zakaht?

Are you paying too much Zakaht?
Look at the table below, if you pay the Zakaht equivalent to 2.5%, then the amount of money that was in your possession for the whole lunar year is shown in the next column. If you received 20K in month 11 then only include £1,666,66p as this is the amount that should be included, the remaining £18,333.34 will need to added next year, if your account is in the positive (i.e out of debt).

If you are paying say £400, then you must be in receipt of £15,500 in you bank and this money should not be off-setting your mortgage and should have been in your account for a period of 12 months. If not divide by 12 and multiply by the number of months it has been in your account. What this table shows is how stupidly Muslims tend to pay Zakaht blindly, not calculating it, not taking into account their circumstances as this is a requirement for calculating 2.5%, making the whole process a joke by competing against one another by publicly announcing a large figure. Zakaht is a collective process, not an individual one attribited to the few.

Example 3: A Muslima gives £400 as Zakaht, she feels this is a good representation since she is sending this money to her family who are poor. Firstly, the zakaht has not been calculated correctly and thus becomes Sadqah, she still owes the zakaht for that year, secondly she does not have £16,000 sitting in her bank as this is off-setting her mortgage (debt) and finally why is this Muslima bank rolling a country overseas, even if it is to end up within her family? Wouldn't you like to question? Who is distributing £28 billion of Zakaht overseas? At present all methods of distribution par one are illegal from Islamic jurispudance point of view. The exception is that in the abscence of the Khaleef, you become the individual Khaleef and can distribute the Zakaht yourself to those needing it as specified in the Qur'an (see spreadsheet). The problem this creates is that the Zakhat collected is being distributed unfairly and is not getting to the Muslims and non-muslims who need it most. So in-efect this process is flawed and is not meeting the objectives of Zakaht worldwide. If the Zakaht were distributed as it is intended through the leadership of the Khaleefah (i.e the Islamic World Government), poverty would be wiped out globally.

Don't presume, or carryout a guesstimate as doing so makes the Zakaht a Sadqah amount. This will mean that you are still accountable for the unpaid Zakaht and this will remain as a burden on your shoulder. This may accumulate into next years spreadsheet.

Also, do remember that any money that is being used to off-set a debt like a mortgage is a liability and as such should be included in your Zakaht calculation. Mortgage payments can be included as a liability against yearly income (see spreadsheet). The current price of a gram of gold is £11.60 (06/10/07), and that Nisab is equal to 85 grams of gold = £11.60 x 85 = £ 986.00. This means that if income - liabilities for each individual is less than this figure no Zakaht is payable.

One final point, by collectively sending the correct amount of Zakaht however small it may be individually (students pay 20p) the collective amounts gathered will equal £28 billion and this is enough to make the Bank of England jealous!

The next question is who do you give the Zakaht too?

Who are eligible for Zakaht?
Allah (SWT) restricted those who are eligible for Al-Zakat to eight types of Muslim. Allah (SWT) says:

" The only Muslims who are eligible for Al-Zakat are: Al-Fuqaraa poor Muslims, Al-Masakeen needy Muslims, Al-‘Aamileen A’liyha those genuine Collectors and distributors of the funds, Al-Mu’alafati Qolubouhum new Muslims, Fil-Riqaab Slave Muslims who wish to free themselves, Al-Gharimeen Muslims who have lawful debts and/or bloodmoney to pay, Fi-Sabeelillah Muslims fighters i.e. Al-Mujahideen and Ibn Al-Sabeel the wayward Muslim travelers and this is an Obligation from Allah for He is Al-A’leem Al-Hakeem" [EMQ 9:60].

The verse is clear as to who we are obliged to pay Zakat. The False Aamileen A’liyha, the so-called collectors from charitable organisations such as Muslim Aid and Islamic Relief, are not included in the above verse nor are they Al-'Aamileen A’liyha i.e. those appointed by Al- Khalifah to collect and distribute Al-Zakat.

The Fuqaha (jurists) from the various Islamic schools of thought e.g. Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’e, Hanbali, Zaahiri, Hadawi and Ja’fari etc. agree that collecting and distributing Al-Zakat is the responsibility of the leader of the Islamic state alone and on those he appoints. We quote the following among them:

Imam Al-Sarkhasi Al-Hanafi in his book Al-Mabsout volume 2 page 162
says: “Al-Zakat is a divine right of Allah (SWT) and is to be collected and distributed by Al-Khalifah or his deputies(only) and whoever pays his Zakat to anyone else, as a collector of Zakat not appointed by the Khalifah, will not remove the burden of paying Zakat from his neck.”

Imam Al-Maliki in his book Al-Muwatta’ at page 225
says: “The Khalifah alone is to distribute the Zakat in accordance with his own Ijtihad ... and It is not allowed for the collector of Al-Zakat to get any share from Al-Zakat except what the Khalifah has specified for him.”

Imam Al-Shafi’e in his book Al-Umm in volume 2 at page 84
says: “Al- 'Aamileen A’liyha are those appointed by Al-Khalifah to collect and to distribute Al-Zakat.”

Imam Ahmad in the book of As-Sharih Al-Rabbani Li-Musnad Ahmad in volume 8 at page 190 says: “The Khalifah alone has the authority and responsibility to collect and to distribute Zakat whether by himself or through those he appoints and has the authority and responsibility to fight those who reject to pay it.”

Imam Ibn Hazim in his book Al-Muhalla in volume 5 at page 268
says:“ Al-Mussaddiq is the one appointed by Al-Khalifah to collect Al-Sadaqaat” he added in the same book in volume 6 at page 44 : “Al-‘Aamil is the collector of Al-Zakat and his situation can be one of two: either a) he is appointed by Al- Khalifah or his deputy who we are obliged to obey or b) he is sent to us by one who we are not obliged to obey . If the collector has been appointed by anyone different than the Khalifah or his deputy we are not obliged to obey him nor are we allowed to pay him our Zakat for Allah (SWT) and his Messenger did not permit others to collect Al-Zakat, nor we are allowed to hand it to them and whoever pays them any money he/she is sinful and does not remove the burden from his/her neck and must pay Al-Zakat again. Those who pay Al-Zakat to a false collector i.e. one not appointed by Al-Khalifah, are aggressors, commit an act of aggression and a prohibited deed because the Messenger Muhammad (SAW) said: “Any deed not based on our command is prohibited”.

Imam Al-Nawawi in his book Al-Majmou’ in volume 6 at page 167
says:“ It is Obligatory upon the Khalifah to appoint and to send the collectors of Al- Zakat because the Messenger Muhammad (SAW) and the Khaleefs after him used to do so. This matter is well known and confirms what has been reported by Sahih Al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim upon the authority of Abou Hurairah that" The Messenger Muhammad (SAW) appointed Omar Bin Al-Khattab to collect Al-Zakat". Moreover it has been reported by Sahih Al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim upon the authority of Sahel Bin Sa’ed that "The Messenger Muhammad (SAW) appointed Ibn Al-Litbiyah to collect Al-Zakat.”.

Imam Ibn Qudama Al-Hanbali in his book Al-Mughni volume 2 page 446
says: “Al-Zakat is a delegatable duty and the Khalifah has the right to fight for it and whoever pays his Zakat to anyone else, as a collector of Zakat not appointed by the Khalifah, will not remove the burden of paying Zakat from his neck.”

Imam Al-Sana’ni in his book Subul Al-Salam volume 2 page 634
says:“ What we mean by the income of the collectors is what is allocated from Al-Zakat by the Khalifah to those he has appointed.”

Imam Al-Hadawi in his book Uyoun Al-Azhaar fi Fiqh Al-Aimmah Al- Atthaar at page 137 says: “The responsibility of the collection of Zakat is a duty upon Al-Imam externally and internally and whoever pays it to anyone else will not remove the burden from his neck, even if he is ignorant, because it is a matter known by necessity.”

Imam Al-Kohajie in his book Zaad Al-Muhtaaj volume 1 page 494
says:“ The Khaleefs after the Messenger Muhammad (SAW) used to appoint the collectors of Zakat. Moreover it is better if a person himself pays his Zakat to the Khalifah directly.”

Imam Ibn A’bideen Al-Hanafi in his book Al-Hashiyyah volume 2 page 3

says: “Al-Zakat will be collected by the collector who Al-Khalifah appoints even if it has to be collected by force because Al-Khalifah or his ‘Aamil are those acting as delegatees Al-Wakeel for any Muslim who is liable to pay Zakat.”

Finial words for those who understand?
It is obligatory for every Muslim who is eligible to pay Zakaht do so as is required by Al-Islam. By calculating the Zakaht using the ITG Calculator Spreadsheet you will gain Multiple rewards. Inform others about the correct way of calculating their Zakaht and Allah(swt) will endower you with pyramid rewards that you will collect all your life! (in accordance Allah(SWT) methods of reward acquisition).

Be SMART and collect Multiple rewards!

iF AT THIS POINT YOU STILL CANNOT DECIDE WHERE TO GIVE YOUR ZAKHAT, GIVE IT TO POLITICAL GROUPS WHO WANT THE RETURN OF THE KHILAFAH USING MUBAH MEANS.

READ MORE

Source: TBC


All Change!
Tyrant's replace tyrant's
!
As General Musharaf is loosing ground, Britain plays the democracy card once more and financially support two discredited, fraudulent allies - Mr Nawaz Sharif & Mrs Benazir Bhutto.
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

Many muslims both in the UK and Worldwide are well aware of what these two actors are capable off, what they had done and what they are going to do. We examine these two tyrants and their fraudulent history.

Theives unite and pledge to return to further embezzle:

Who is Mr. Nawaz Sharif & Mrs Benazir Bhutto?
To be frank, Benazir Bhutto has committed countless acts of fraud, found to have embezzled millions of pounds in foreign exchange in a swiss bank accounts, money owned by the Pakistani people and exiled herself before being arrested and put on trial, i,.e the British government gave her an escape route. She vows to get rid of the judicial system that convicted her of such acts of gross fraud. This is a woman who knows that it is forbidden in Islam for a woman to act as a head of state, yet defy's Allah(swt).

Now Mr. Nawas Sharif, a business man who made billions sitting on the lap of General Zia in the 1970s. He was naturally groomed to be the next successor after Zia had departed. A politcian who surrounds himself much like the fallen dictator Saddam Hussein. His record is just as horrifying, it is alleged that he has committed countless murders in order to archive his ultimate goal, to become what the President is today. Being power hunger, the Muslims living in Pakistan must not forget that he too has been convicted of fraud, stripped off his business and has warrants against him if he were to return to Pakistan.

Now the real story that Muslims should heed.?
Both these tyrants are and always will be subjects of the British Queen. They will always ally themselves and take guidance and orders from the British establishment. They are puppets to the western design and will sell out the Muslims in Pakistan. Instead of stability, they will cause havoc with its neighbor India and undervalue Afghani satan as a strategic outpost. They will sell Pakistan's wealth producing assets by agreeing to IMF, World bank and embezzle further until Pakistan will be internationally crippled.

Lets not forget the General!
Muslims living in Pakistan hate the general and what he stands for, they have had enough of him. They want change, they want Islam, they want a REAL islamic government that is free from foreign influence and want a level of isolationism, much like that of the USA during the 17-18 century. Enough time for it to become a light for all the muslim countries to follow. This will not happen while Pakistan is owned by foreign governments, foreign financial institutions and by Generals who enjoy the media debacle and do the dirty work of their western masters. I give you General Perveez Musharaf.

 

How does the British Government
pay for its World Wars worldwide?

Wars cost alot of money, and the masses must pay for any war undertaken by its government.
Many muslims in the UK are unawear that they are paying for the war in Iraq, Indonesia, Afghanistan, Bosnia and Seara Leon. That the government continues to make its people pay for a war they did not want. What should the masses do about it?
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

When 2 million protestors of the anti-war campagn where powerless to do anything, these very 2 Million are what the government are still worried about, since if they were to find out that the very same goverment was getting them to pay for the war they might retaliate.

The British War Chest bumped up by:

Increased fuel tax?
During the reign of Magret thatcher, and her subsequent sucesssor John Major. The Fuel tax was set at a scalar increase so as the price of oil increased, the tax increased (£39p/ltr-1986 to £88p/ltr-2004), but as the price of oil decreased the tax remained at its high point never to reduce! (Skimming). Only when the Labour party had won the election,completed its first five years in office did it pledge to remove the scaler tax and return the monies to the public. The estimated 20 Billion pounds was transfered to the war chest instead.
(Source for amount:BBC News).

Increased bills from Utility Companies (Gas, Electricity)?
Stories about gas being expensive and electricity generation is a farce, aloud for becasue during WWII all industries fell under the authorities of the Ministry of Defence and as such fuel was set according to economic conditions. The price is artificially set high to gather as much revenue for the war chest as possible.

Cutting overseas development aid?
Did you ever wonder why Overseas Deelopment minister Clair Short
resigned over the Iraq invasionary war? Well now you know, the british goverment needed money and so certian dempartments had major cost cuts.

Increase in Road Tax, Air Tax and Insurance tax?
The increases have occured during the past fifteen years. Thats the planning time required for GHCQ to enforce preperations for war.

Increase in Road Toll Crossings throughout England?
Telford crossing is a typical example, where the bridge had paid for itself ten fold, yet as promised no free crossings? Why not!

Increase in Congestion Charging, throughout ten major cities in England?
This is the icing on the cake, from £5 to £8, soon to be £10 and eventually £15. Lets re-elect the always labour candidate in disguise., it can only be Venezuelan kingpin Ken Livingstone. So, you mean he stood as an independent so that Labour would not be tarnished? Got it in one! The congestion charge has raised £400 billion since it started business 6 years ago and has been rolled out to 10 major cities throughout the UK.

There are so many other taxes, some that have just been introduced like the House buyers report costing £600 per houshold, first for 4 bedroom houses then for all types of dwellings. The funny thing is the Britisah public are willing to pay what ever price is necessary so its government kills humanity in the name of democracy.

 

Who supported
Saddam and Udday?

A version of History seldom forgotten!
Recently there has been a push to convince western audiances that Saddam and his tribe were out of control and british intervention was undeniable unqueastionable. But Muslims are not easily fooled?
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

We look into the geopolitical systems that exist controlling many of the Muslim regimes, including the post Saddams regime. It was'nt all Saddam, western goverments need strong leadership, to control the masses, a leadership that is anti-islam and is especially capable of murderous intent are favoured!

TBC?

Jewish treachory
on a large global scale.

A version of History seldom forgotten!
Muslims have forgotten how the Jewish (mainly zionist) community have their hand in every war since mankind ever existed on planet earth.
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

We look into history and try to piece together the dangerous jewish plot of demonizing the world at the expense of placing the rest of humanity into slavery. We also look at the numbers of Jews who died at the hands of the Nazis and wonder why the numbers don't add up? Was it really a genocide massacre?

TBC?

America's
Jaba the Hut in
Baghdad (2004).

Who controls the Shia death squads (Bada) in Iraq?
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

American Ethnic cleansing is what was used in Bosnia against the Sunni Muslims at the hands of the Serbian militia, and now the American government have supported the Shia Militia operations in Baghdad under the authority of Jaba the Hut. (who is now finance minister).
[Dispatches, Channel4]


America and the United nations need quick results in Iraq
The American and British contingence's in Iraq are not interested in the betterment of the Iraqi citizen. Nor are the occupying forces interested in the education and welfare of 5year old Muslims whether shia or Sunni. They are in Iraq to divide and rule. The plan is to design a sectarian civil war, in which the Americans and British will provide a solution to stop the killings, killings that they had perpetrated in the first place.

When young muslims, 5-6 year old witness their parents being murdered in Baghdad while the nearby governments of the UN namely Pakistan, Egypt and Syria look on and laugh inwardly. It is disheartening and is proof that watching satellite entertainment is not going to quell the unease of the soul.

The Anglo-American Plan
1. Install a government that will do as it is told (Iraqi government)
2. Root out Extremists (Muslims who are opposed to American/British plans in the region)
3. To train death squads to kill indiscriminately while blaming the government they implemented in the first place, thereby relinquishing blame away from the US and British government.
4. Promote worldwide media of sectarian civil war
5. Carryout Military clear up operations against the death squads that they planted in the first place
6. While Muslims are tortured and killed, the US Military look on surprised.
7. Rumsfield is fired and his replacement given new orders to further mame Muslims

8 British government supports the American initiative while silencing the Muslim governments in the United Nations.
9. The United Nations is working full out, placing great pressure upon America and Britain to destroy Islamic assets in Iraq before pulling out.
10. Musharaf or Pakistan requests the American government to kill as many Muslim separatists as possible he is ready to assist at any level.
11. Iran is cranked up as a danger to Israel, had Muslims forgotten the 1 month war planned by the Americans in the middleast? It seems like a million years ago!

TBC

Big Brothers
Racist Mother!

The Reality programme "Big Brother" aired on National TV on Channel4 has a lot to answer after viewers witness racism and bullying.
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

We look into whether the programme makers and those that air such programs are colluding with the government. That the issue of Racism gives credibility to Mr Blair, while his chancellor visiting India gives the perception that the British government is anti-racist?


What has an Indian female actor(Shilpa Shetty) , British government (tony blair), an official visit by the chancellor to India and channel4 have in common?
It doesn't take a nuclear scientist or a Professor of mathematics to realises a connection of a well planned event. Have you ever wondered why failed male and female actors are portrayed on game shows such as Big Brother? Abiet a method to revive or boost their failing careers? In the case of Shilpa, Bollywood is looking towards increasing its failing audience in Europe by injecting controversies on Big Brother, thereby appeasing Amitabh Bhuchan studios into breaking into the european market, a market that has so far eluded him as well as bollywood in general. The new plan is to make something of Shilpa and reignite an old and dwindling flame, to get the Muslims to watch brain hemoraging bollywood flicks and divert them away from real issues that affect the Muslim nation. The plan will fail because Muslims are not as un charismatic as the music makers seems to think? The other spin off concerns the illusion that the british government and its policy on racial hatred (Terrorism Act 2004) that racism will not be tolerated, is of course only applied to Muslims in general living in Britain. Muslims don't belive any government that has sided with the US on taking revenge against muslims over September 11. Recently Tony Blair was asked about why repercussions where not handed down to the Saudi Government over their alleged affairs, blair refereed to the immense help the Saudi government was providing in keeping up the massacre of Muslims and the occupation of Muslim land in Iraq and in general the Middle East? Well, since no Saudi government spokesmen has come forward to negate such acquisitions, then it must be true. Muslims can conclude that while the kingdom of Saudi Arabia exists no Hajj is valid.

The British chancellor reportedly said to journalists that the British public is tolerant and are not racist, making no differentiation toward cultural differences. Lets consider Muslims who have lived all their lives in Britain, brought up sampling British Culture. The exception to this rule are Muslims born in the UK who had migrated aboard and lived most of their adult life abroad. Muslims living in Britain are not British Muslims (misnomer term) or have foreign cultural backgrounds? Muslims living in Britain are culturally connected to Britain and live under Islamic Laws. Islamic laws are provided by Allah(swt) in the Qur'an and the Sunnah, referring to Shairah for Islamic law and not English law or any other man-made law. Muslims in Britain are trapped in Britain, that is until a worldwide Islamic Government is in place.

(Muslims are simply not permitted to accept any other laws under the injunctions of being Muslims according to Islam. Islam is not a person, or a country, it is a political system that encompass an educational, Judicial, Economic, Sociopolitical system. How can non-muslims or Muslims for that matter speak about Islam as just a mere religion? Religions such as Christianity and Judaism do not have necessary components to run a civil state with reference to their reveled divine books. Islam does, and this makes Islam unique and very powerful when implemented correctly.)

Sweeping Racism under the carpet is the answer?
The leader of the opposition party (Conservatives) when asked about his view concerning the racist conduct and blatant bullying, hid behind a veil of no interest, and advised Muslims and Asians to just simply switch off the television. Such an action is that of sweeping under the carpet a known inherent social problem. Mr Cameroon simply does not understand that by switching off the TV, does not stop the racism? (BBCNews24 Wed17/01/07)?

Lets look a little deeper. Is it all about the show, the contestants? Maybe we are looking at something that was always there but never challenged? With the police force and army regarded as institutionally racist, we understand that a core element of British culture includes an element of National Racism. Perhaps, British Culture being nationalistic despises other competing nations, could this be where the problem lies? The fault being squarely at British Culture. But how do we change the harts and minds of the British public. This is a problem for the government of britain. Simply waving a magic wand and having the british public wake up to a new way of thinking is not going to happen overnight. The problem exists within Nationalism and this is the root problem. Since British culture has failed to deliver an answer to this racist element within society, the government just tolerate it! The answer to this is simple, if only people understood the need for new change.

TBE

Live Aid or Military Aid?
In the 1980s Ethiopia was hit by a devastating drout, but did the monies find their way to the poor and needy or to bolster the Ethiopian army?
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

We look into how a country that exports nothing to the world and has a failed economy is able to defend its borders with jet fighters and use of latest weaponry targeting Muslims in the border with Somalia and Eritrea?


What was Live Aid about? Who gained, lost and who were conned?

TBE


Saddam Hussein.
The Muslim world is left a little confused over what to make of Saddam's execution!
Muslims have had mixed feelings over his execution, but least did they know that his execution was illegal from an Islamic point of view.
Learn More Internal Link >
Read More ... [ ]

We look into whether Saddam Hussein should have been trailed and executed and uncover a failure by Muslims to acknowledge simple Islamic rules and regulations regarding such matters.

What happens when a state is being occupied by a foreign power?
Historically, when a foreign power invades and occupiers Muslim land one of the first actions of a Muslim government under siege is to release all prisoners from all government prisons/jails. These very dangerous criminals where set free to fight alongside Muslims against a common foe (the invading army). This became a rule and not the exception. This rule had been used many times and was used to great effect. It also meant that the previous misgivings of the criminal, however severe it may have been were pardoned under the extreme difficulties of the moment. In essence what this meant to Saddam Hessian is that as soon as he took up arms against an invading occupying force he fell into this category and thus became a freedom fighter, pardoned in Shari'ah law and not as the US call him on the run as a pack of cards (US mind manipulation technique!).

What had happened and what was said were ALL fabricated!
Both American and British psychologists and Scientists thought hard about how best to sociologically prepare, change and modify Muslim hearts and minds when considering what to do with captured Saddam Hessian. The Muslims with knowledge knew that the illegitimate government in Baghdad would play to the Saddam haters and that this may sway them to consider the coalition government as a way forward. The only problem has been and still is today, Muslims of Iraq are ahead of the game even though many Muslims worldwide were and are still being brainwashed by the American intelligence machine. The Media being controlled by western secular governments, used Saddam to prove to the world that an occupying force can do what they want regardless of any bilateral arrangements with Geneva. The simple truth is that an occupying force should correctly be detested with every fiber of an individuals being, and this has been the case historically and from an anthropological viewpoint. The only exception being once in history when a Muslim army entered a non-islamic territory without authorization and that resulted in their immediate withdrawal (Read Islamic History - very interesting!).

Was Saddam in a hole, hiding as the Americans had staged? Muslims cannot prove or disprove any information form the non-beliving people. Allah(swt) in many Ayates in the Qur'an warns the Muslims never to accept the words that emminate from the non-belivers ( Its interesting that the non-beliving secular media are able to place lables on Muslims as being terrorists, Islamists and foreigners on Muslim land, the very same Muslims that were labbled freedom fighters in the late 70s, yet Muslims calling countries like Britain and America as invaders and occupiers and as global Terrorists regimes is frowned upon even by Muslims holding green cards in America and those given indefinite leave of stay in Britain.)

Why execute Saddam when he could have been jailed?
The American think tank that include psychologist scientists have a firm belief that attacking Islam is the ultimate goal in their long term political objectives. It has become a necessity to engage in a media war that shows Islam as a backward system unable to resolve problems of modern times. One particular area has been portraying Shari'ah Law as being a monster (reference: to news in African countries that have a MUslim government and you will clearly identify this, esp. Eriteria and Somalia) . It gives and impression that executions are the only answer to difficult questions, questions that Muslims are social unable to answer, due firstly to their limited minds and secondary to the failings of Islam as a system to live by. The media that include he Cinema,Television, Newspaper and the Internet has been for the past twenty years a place in which keywords have been used to change the Muslim mind set into believing that Islam is unable to resolve social problems. WIth this in mind executions that don't sit well with western populations consider Islam as barbaric and outdated. This allows the non-beliving think tank to play the tune that they are occupying Muslim lands as a means to resolve conflicts that Islam cannot resolve - completely false claims. We would like to mention that America does have death row and even though Britain outlawed executions in the mid 1950s it too has no repulsion to detain indefinitely Muslims in prison without reason? By executing Saddam by secret hanging, just shows how pathetic the American government has become, its planted government in Iraq does what its father (United States) and mother (Britain) tells them. By showing the execution they belived the Muslims could be convinced that (1) they were in complete control of all the lives they had under their illegitimate occupation, (2) the Muslims hearts and minds would change to their point of view both in Iraq and worldwide, by using scare tack tics, (3) to send a clear message to Muslim terrorists(freedom fighters) everywhere that there outcome would be the same and (4) Muslims should do as they are told. Well, this is a tall order? The only snag being that instead of concealing the Islamic rules and laws form the Muslims as they have been doing for the past century, Saddam's outcome raised the eyebrows of Muslims who had no idea of Islamic principle or state regulations. Instead of battering the Muslims further, the American and British did something they are now regretting.

The Muslims began to question whether the execution was permitted under Islamic law or was the circus courts a crime against humanity? (Note: We would like to point out that the author of this article is not a supporter of any tyrants in any shape or form). What Saddam did prior to the occupation is very different set of situations that changed after the occupation. Just like when a Kafir confirms the Shaad'ah and in a split second he becomes a Muslim and his previous actions are null and void, who can say the same cannot be offered to Saddam?

Lets look at the man "Saddam Hussein", what was he before the occupation? Saddam was a tyrant, planted by western governments and Russia to overthrow the monarchy in Iraq in the late seventies. A monarchy that Britain had previously planted for their own interests. Saddam was a planted dictator on the likes of many other leading political personalities (actors, Puppet Regimes) who are even in power today (Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Indonesia, Malaysia, many African countries). After purchasing military equipment worldwide, arming and training a 1 Million army, Saddam conspired with his masters to wipe out his own Iraqi populations in a phony proxy war that left 5 Million children dead and the UN to turn the other cheek. This he did either directly or indirectly it does not matter, it was done wit the express support of western nations that include the UN and European Union. He definitely deserved an execution, but so did many of the heads of states in the western world that include the Presidents of America and Prime Ministers in Britain (In the correct context It is not correct to consider the actions of one man here or there as this would be shallow thinking and very stupid, it is the government and its elected people that are to blame, reference is made to Tony Blair's own advisors during the balkan Wars) . These governments account for covert operations that have cost the lives of Muslims as well and non-muslims globally. Worst still, it is their ability to deny such operations or avoid questioning that makes them criminal. Select committees in the House of representatives or the scrutiny panel in the British Parliament were set-up to counter such criticisms, making people belive the government was being checked. But alas, this is also part of the deception game played out by these governments to make their own populations belive democracy is working? Democracy is the tool by which war mongering nations such as America and Britain can exercise their desire to dominate over all other nations and peoples. Saddam bought the chemicals from British and American companies, with proper legal documentation. The steel in the manufacture the long range gun was bought from British Steel here in the UK with the consent of the DTI (department for trade and industry). The question is who did Saddam want to use the chemical bombs against? Donald Rumsfield takes the lead here as an ambassador of the United Sates, a close friend and alley of Saddam for many years pointed him toward Iran. While this war raged on, supported by western countries, Saddam used chemical weapons against his neighbor and he was shown to be a dictator gone mad. The Western world media labeled Muslims, better put Islam as an aggressor in a civilized world, using chemical weapons against unarmed men, women and children in towns and villages. Clearly Muslims were killing Muslims in the name of America. This again was a means to further subdue the western world into believing that Islam and Muslims are tyrannical tyrants that must be opposed. The mere notion of the return of Islam as global international power was portrayed as a road to the destruction of western civilization, an outcome that was to fought at all levels and fronts - this was all made up and western populations were convinced through the use of the media that Islam was and is the largest threat to western civilization (misnomer).

Was Saddam a Sunni Muslim? What did he belive in?
It is a very sad fact that many Muslims worldwide were not aware that Saddam was not a Muslim, he was not Sunni and had no plans to implement Islam in Iraq. The Baathiest ruling party in Iraq and Jordan is not Islamic at all, in fact quite the opposite, it holds more closely to Russian Stalinism or better put Marxism with a ruthless one-party dictator at the helm. A Military dictatorship much like that of Pakistan, Egypt and American led Saudi Arabia controlled Iraq. With the goal of planting further US and British bases in the Middle east to control the flow of oil (the Achilles heel of the western world) much was levied against Saddam, the Americans saw no future for him and planned for his demise, perhaps to silence him forever. Why stop at Saddam, should the supporters of such regimes be classified as those that comit crimes against humanity?

The occupation changed Saddam's future, not as a tyrant or dictator but under the rules and regulations contained in Islam he died as a freedom fighter. This is where many Muslims have forgotten or are unaware of the significance of his execution. Under Islamic law he did not die as a dictator, it was illegal for him to be executed under Islamic law so what law was he killed under? He was killed as a Martyr and this is not going to sit well with the Muslims of the region both Sunni and Shia (Iran). As this clear act of gross misconduct on the part of the occupying forces is going to cost America and Britain dearly. By agitating the Muslims so they give up their positions, under the watchful eyes of satellites is both fictional and unreliable, the Muslims are not stupid!

Allah(swt) in the Qur'an stated that, "what is good for you may be bad for you and what is bad for you maybe good for you". perhaps some good will come out of Saddam's martyrdom only Allah(swt) knows.

One final point, our beloved prophet Muhammad(saaw)Allah(swt) states while pointing to the Ka bah,"..that one drop of blood from a Muslim is more valuable than the Ka bah and all around it".

One final point, how many people have been killed by America and Britain over the past century? Much more than that killed by Saddam or during the whole of mankind's history. The death toll continue to rise as these war mongering nations rule the planet without any regard to human life. Only by the systems contained in political Islam will their be a long lasting and truthful peace for all humanity. Inshallah!

TBC

 

Dummies guide to
Brainwash the British Public?

Channel 4's programme titled "The Begineers guide to Islam", designed to put -off free thinking non-muslims from finding out the true essence of Islam.
Learn More External Link >
Read More ... []

A posh girl from chelsea (Peaches Geldof) visits Morocco trying to learn about Islam. The programme content is poor, with a propaganda outlook paints a morbid picture unrepresentative of Islam. We put the record straight.

A girl who's already made her mind up!
A pointless exercise:- Choose a girl who is secular, dislikes religion, armed with quotes from materialists about the creation of life, life sciences and place her in an environment she is not accustomed too. This all sounds like a well scripted propaganda documentary about a girl who has already made her mind up?

The title is meant to mislead, the program does nothing to aid a non-muslim to understand the true essence of Islam. It being scripted to put-off any notion of anything meaningfully good, only draw the audiences attention to the bad. Lets walk through the programme and fill the gaps so to speak:

Girl asks questions and receives all the wrong answers (inc. comments, and remarks):

Q1. Morocco is a Muslim country with 88% Sunni muslims.
A1: Morocco is run by a kingship which is Haram in Islam and the state does not represent an Islamic system or anywhere near an Islamic World Government. The royal family (King MOHAMED VI) were installed/planted by the French colonialist and the Government is indirectly controlled by France. The country is run by a secular government that opposes Islamic values as explained by the Muslim girl who was not permitted to wear her hijab while on school campus (ref: Franch opposition to Hijab).

Q2: Why do Muslims women were Hijab or Borcha?
A2: The answer provided by the Muslim girl was wrong, it is no for protection. In fact, the Qur'an authorized the Hijab and covering of the head to the Prophets wives, thus it becomes Sunnah (recommended) giving reward to those who apply. Another important point is that Allah(swt) in the Qur'an does not give any reason for it, it is a directed command and so it was not correct for the Muslim girl to state that it is a reason soley for protection. Peach was happy that she made that slip-up and further showed the flawlessness of this reasoning by walking the streets and bazaars only to be haggled by some men folk while she was wearing a Hijab.The muslim girl was right to point out that the Hijab demands respect, after all the wearer is following the sunnah of the Prophet(saaw). Not much can be said about the men encountered while they walked the bazaars.

Q3: Do you need to change clothes while visiting a Muslim country?
       What is the dress code for getting into paradise?
A3: The Muslim girl highlights the importance of being dressed appropriately for the occasion. Wearing skimpy clothes would be against the Islamic dress code. Peach was to integrate into Muslim society, however she was reluctant to do so at all attempts, wanting to impose her own way of life instead. Was this the real reason for the programme, to confuse the non-muslims and moderate Muslims watching the programme when it is aired back home?

It is not absolutly necessary for Peach to wear an Islamic dress, acceptable english clothes could have been worn that were just not revealing. Her inability to contain herself at times was a sign like that of binge drinking syndrome and was at times a cause for concern, placed in any society even here in the UK!

A further point to note is that when Peach shows off here reviling clothes, the Muslim girl fails to mention that in private the Peach could wear whatever she wanted.However, in public such clothes were inappropriate.

Q4: The word "Marks" is interchageably used to replace the word "Rewards", is that correct?
A4: What ever a Muslim does is act of worship. For every act of worship their is reward. How much reward is decided by Allah(swt) and one act could be equivalent to performing Hajj! A Muslim runs to attain rewards as this will help them in the life they lead as well as in the afterlife. The emphasis is on gaining reward and not be disobedient against Allah(swt). It was incorrect for the Muslim girl to attribute obtaining rewards as a means to enter paradise? After all what is paradise? The western view of paradise is clouds, sainthood and always doing good deeds! This is certainly not paradise according to the Qur'an.

Q5: Why is a 35 year old man marrying a 18 year old woman without love? Is that right?
A5: Most arranged marriages work out well. The conflict arises when local customs interfere with Islamic views regarding marriage. When conflict arises the custom is rejected for the Islamic view. Islam gives power to the parent or guardian only when the bride is unable to decide for herself. This in no way means that since a woman marries young she is unaware of the significance of marriage. She has the islamic right to reject the suitor at any stage. She is not placed under duress, however if she was under duress then the Islamic marriage is void and the guardians would be blamed giving rise to civil disobedience. But thankfully their are safeguards and these are incorporated into the Marriage contract known as the Nikah. Muslim parents who belive that they have an ultimate overriding position regarding the suitor of their daughter are clearly mistaken and will anger Allah(swt) by marrying their daughter against her wishes.The youngest age to marry a girl is 12, and the consensus is to give the girl a good education before finding a suitable suitor or for her.

Age is not a stumbling block, however an old man aged 80 would be inappropriate for marriage to a woman in her late teens or twenties for obvious reasons.

Q6: How many times is the prayer preformed and haw many rakahs?
A6: Five times a day at appropriate times. The dawn prayer known as Fajir is preformed just before sunrise and has a dual function to awaken the mind for the start of the day. The minimum number of rakahs that need to be preformed is four or to put anotheer way to complete the Fard prayer can take roughly four minutes to complete! It was incorrect for Peach to suggest 140 rakahas!

Q7: Submission is scary? As Muslims you must attend the mosque at every prayer times.
A7: Each prayer lasts 10 minutes at the mosque, out of the total time that a muslim has during the day you submit less than 50 minutes of time to the creator who created you, fashioned you, gave you eyes to see, ears to hear and a mind to think. It does not sound like a lot of your time. These intermissions while you pray, away from your hectic lifestyle allows a muslims to reflect upon and be at peace with themselves, freshen up their minds and think a new. It is not necessary for a muslim to be present at the mosque at every azaan, however congregation is preferable, muslims can do their fard prayers anywhere so long as it is permissible to do so and that your not in any danger. The rewards are greater at the mosque in congregation and so it is more beneficial. It is not a punishable offence for not attending the Fard prayer since you may have a ligitimate reason, you could do the fard prayer before and uptill the time for it is to end.. Forcing muslims into mosques is not permissible. A muslim that forgets completing a prayer can make it up later. As for submission, muslims are constantly reminded of Allah(swt) in the form of the Azaan (Call for prayer) its purpose to remind Muslims that those before you (jews and Christians) forgot Allah(swt) over time and that the Muslims must never forget their connection with the creator of all things.

It should be noted that Allah(swt) is most merciful and can read hearts and minds.

Q8: Peaches remarks that she is a disappointing student?
A8: The true essence of Islam does not come to you just because your reciting the Qur'an, or do five times prayer, or think your doing good works? To see through the window of Islam you must be committed to searching for answers to deep questions, those that the materialists have failed to answer and have filled important rational facts with theories that cannot be proven. Since miss Geldof never intended to be a muslim, how could she really understand or contemplate it? Her stereotypes, western lifestyle and alien concepts that she carries within her, those that she holds so dear, close to her heart will make it impossible for her to see through a fabric vail, let alone see through a window toward Islam?

We question her motives and understand the real reason behind shooting this short documentary. Peaches is not as innocent as she makes out and like her father (bob) is doing the British Governments dirty work. That to confuse the majority of the British non-muslim public and dine with the Moderate Muslims who will praise her afterwards

Peaches is fiercely resilient to converting to Islam for the very reasons outlined above. Her goal as was the production of a short documentary, designed to redicule the Islamic faith and answer questions with a shallow perspective, sometimes confusing her hosts with materialism quotes and neurotic skepticism.

Q9: Peach cannot get to grips with the Qur'an!
A9: If the reader has a closed mind and as explained in A8 above, then their is no way for her to understand or comprehend the Qur'an in any language. When you open up a best selling novel, you have an intention before you even buy it off the shelf that you are committed to reading it, comprehending it and understand the plots within it so you can be enriched by its ending or overall immpression upon you. Since Peaches had no such intention, why consider the Qur'an in the documentary?

Background: A well know Christian reverted (not converted) to Islam became a translator of the Qur'an. (Mohammed) Marmaduke William Pickthall, was a Western Islamic scholar, noted as a poetic and accurate translator of the Qur'an into English. A revert from Christianity to Islam, Pickthall was a novelist, esteemed by D.H. Lawrence, H.G. Wells, and E.M. Forster, as well as a journalist, headmaster, and political and religious leader. Educated at Harrow, he was born into a comfortable middle class English family, whose roots trace back to a knight of William the Conqueror, Pickthall travelled across many Eastern countries, gaining reputation as Middle-Eastern scholar. A strong advocate of the Ottoman Empire, Pickthall studied Islam, published articles and novels on the subject, e.g. The meaning of the Holy Qur'an. While under the service of the Nizam of Hyderabad, Pickthall published his translation of the Qur'an, becoming the first English translation done by a believer and authorized by the Al-Azhar University, referred to by the Times Literary Supplement as "a great literary achievement."

So the Qur'an is in English, yet it is a daunting task for Peach! - how delightful!
Islam for dummies is not as daunting, yet she doesn't seem to be reading that either!

Q10: The Muslim girl nos 2 says that the Qur'an is the Islamic Law!
A10: We beg to differ on that point, Islamic law is termed as Shari'ah Law and it is a book with references to two main sources, the Qur'an and Sunnah of the Prophet(saaw). Every muslim should know that? Another inaccurate remark was the notion that the Qur'an has all the answers, well its not complete without one further component. The Qur'an authorizes the Prophet's Sunnah and so since Muhammad(saaw) is a guide and his Sunnah is authorized by Allah(Swt) in the Qur'an his guidance is thus approved and can be followed. The Qur'an is not the only source fro a muslim to lead there lives, it goes hand in hand with the Sunnah. A Sheikh once commented that if a Muslim accepts just the Qur'an, they would have binned 70% of Islam only relying on 30% which does not constitute Islam? A muslim would therefore live a life outside of Islam and die in disgrace!

Q11: Peach asks what's the point of a Quranic school!
A11: Why recite the Qur'an and memorize it? Well the answer to that question is partly historical and reward based. First the history; in the 12CE the barbers pillaged, raped and killed Muslims while occupying Muslim land. They were from Mongolia and their leader Genghis Khan married to a christian woman hunted down Muslims and burnt the great Library of the time in Baghdad. All the Qur'an's and scientific books of the time where burnt in a very large fire. The Barbers occupied the lands and imposed their anti-religious laws upon the Muslims. The Muslims had four copies of the Original Qur'an held in secret locations at the furthest ends of the Islamic state. Unknown to the barbers the Muslims had begun to recite the Qur'an by heart and soon they knew that wiping the Qur'an from the face of the earth was not as easy a task as once thought. It only took one Muslim and the Qur'an could be rewritten without error. After 50 years of occupation the barbers reverted and became Muslim and it was the barbers who liberated lands in eastern Europe and northern africa, such a feat had never been witnessed before that an occupying force embraced a religion by its own free-will. The push into Spain was completed by Moorish forces who were predominantly black with a 19 year old non-black as their commanding general as they pushed into Spain up until the mountains of leon, only to then sign a treaty with the outgoing Spanish king. The importance of memory recitation has never left the Muslims and holds ever so strongly today. Such barbarous tactics by burring books were undertaken by Hitler as well as the Russians in the 19th century. Reciting the Qur'an will give you one reward, while applying what you have understood in your life is a reward equal to a thousand fold.

Q12: Peach remarks," What they don't know is that the English loose purposely"!
A12: This is a tactic use for Cricket and all types of sports when political ground is to be made by the british. Its not a new concept and Muslims worldwide are waking up to this fact that being used like puppets is unwarranted.

Q13: Peach remarks," We have to leave, they are going pervy, the Qur'an has not taught them everything"!
A13: Another attack against the Islamic dress code and falling levels of morality in Morocco. But wait a minute wasn't she provocatively dancing and showing off her body as she scored that all important goal? We wonder where london clubs fit in with this pervy message, that while dancing in a london nightclub, having thighs felt-up by clubbers, sometimes even by the same sex, being gazed at by on lookers is considered remotely pervy! I guess it must be your point of view.

Q14: Peach finds sufism very scary and remote.
A14: Sufism is a mystical sect that belive's that by going into a trance they archive oneness and an ability to cross a spiritual bridge that can lead to Allah(swt). Mainstream Islam (Illumi) disagree with this assumption to a degree, acknowledging that Allah(swt) can be reached but not nessesaraly by inducing a trance, dancing and by Music. Sufism numbs the mind and could be considered just another form of meditation. But that's all it is, it is not political and has no place in Political Islam. Sufism will be carefully monitored once an Islamic World Government is in place since non adherence to Islam comprehensively by so called Muslims could be deemed dangerous to humanity at large or to a lesser extent diverting away from the Islamic objectives of the day. Real Muslims (Ulumi) must not be led astray by this sect. It is also possible for a Moderate to be following Sufism.

Q15: Peach's guide mentions the significance of "the King of the Jinn's".
A15: Why would Muslims want to visit a rock to get rid of jinns and not ask Allah(swt) directly for protection? We fail to understand this and as such belive that people who suffer from jinns have something wrong with their belief or have a mental problem that needs attention with careful support and help by professionals.

Q16: Peach recites quotes form a a well rehearsed materialist book.
A16: "...So what you mean is that you are pointing Thomas ???? cosmetological argument and William ????? sign argument, ....something about the big bang and ....by blind chance.." Quoting books is easy, especially when you haven't done any of your own soul searching or hard work yourself!

Q17: When Peach was meditating she summed up her time with sarcasm, the word
        "Shopping".

A17: "Shopping" relates to consumerism and the buying or selling of products. These products where made from resources that were forged together through some industrial process and the raw materials came from the ground , mostly from Synthetic Oil. But where did the Oil come from? Humanity certainly did not make it? Who made the planets, the sun, the universe, mankind? So meditation isn't too bad and she wasn't too far from the truth, was she?

Q18: Peach belive's in a completely free from meat Vegan diet.
A17: It is a well know fact that Vegan diets do more harm to the body than Meat eating does. A Vegan Diet stops the production of essential oils in the body that can lead brain damage and madness. So beware Vegan's, you cannot have a completely meat free diet. We recommend some fish, with good omega 3 oils. as a supplement. Muslims can be vegetarian, there is no problem with that. If muslims are given meat at Eid, they will respect that and give to other memebers of their family that do eat meat.

Inforamtion about the programme:

Shown on Channel 4, first aired on Tuesday 05th September @ 23:00.

Notes:
This review is written to clarify, correct and outline opinion where necessary and no way reflects upon the character of Peach Geldof since she acted according to scripts written by the production company.

We welcome any constructive feedback on this topic.


Why make Islamic decisions
so complex? It's EASY as pie!

Muslims living in the Uk find themselves bombarded by pier pressure, tv programs, imams, unqualified sheiks and celebratory personalities who profess to know how a Muslim should decide on a particular life question? or do they?
Learn More External Link >Read More ... []  
The current barrage of television programs on terrestrial tv is giving the young muslims the impression that Islam has multiple answers for any particular life problem. These programmes have been designed to show how muddy Islam is when making decision according to an Islamic viewpoint (BBC 4 correspondent remark). We show you how wrong they are and how easy it is for a muslim to learn and find out the answer to any problem.
       
Firstly, what are the credentials of a Scholar and can anyone who professes to be a scholar have the authority to give you credible answers (Hukm) according to Qur'an and Sunnah?    Keywords
  Answer: Only a qualified sheikh of usool, with a clear line of lineage from respected sheiks, credentials of where they had learnt their knowledge and is a qualified Mustajid would be authorized to give you Hukm according to the Qur'an and Sunnah since he is qualified to extract the laws and disseminate them. Muslims who have the knowledge are permitted to pass on this knowledge to other Muslims with references they may know, but on specific points a sheikh is best suited. Consulting and obtaining an answer from a Sheikh is FREE!   Dawa
Dar-ul-kufr
Dar-ul-islam
Extremist
English Law (Haram)
Illumi
Muslim
Islam (Components)
 
State Terrorism
United Nations
Usuli Muslim
 
But what about the four schools of thought? How do these schools fit into reality when one interpretation may be different to the other?   Usul-ul-fiqh
  Answer: The four schools of thought are Maliki, Humbali, Shaahfi and Hanifi. These are the names of qualified jurors of Usool. They where the heads of Islamic jurisprudence of the time and were to give rulings from Qur'an and Sunnah to the Khalifs and the Muslim nation (ummah) of the Islamic world government (dismantled by the British in 1924, it was the unified body of the Muslim nation for 1400 years). Now, the Sunnat Al-Jamah (Muslim consensus) is that you can either (i) follow a particular school comprehensively or (ii) obtain ruling for all four schools of thought and choose the most lenient. The later is preferred since it is more desirable than the former. It is however not permitted for a Muslims to circumvent the four schools and bring about their own ruling as this may contradict the immense work of the four schools and of which further interpretations are just not possible without contradicting the Quran and Sunnah. That said, the use of Istijad can only be implemented by an individual when (1) the Qur'an has been refereed to four times and (2) Sunnah three times and (3) that any ruling by Istijad must not contradict the laws and rules contained in the Qur'an or the Sunnah. You can add Shari'ah law to this also since it too is derived from the Qur'an and the Sunnah. This means the ruling of Istijad is acceptable if it passes the provisions laid out above.  



But what if the problem is a new one, predating the Islaamic World government of the past (765-1924CE)?    
  Answer: Lets have an example - The use of donor organs is an interesting topic. On a recent show on Channel 4 Shari'ah TV (misnomer title) the topic of whether Muslims were allowed to offer by contract (Donor card) their organs for transplant when they are announced brain dead, to give the gift of life to another human being (Q: Can a muslim organ be transplanted into a Kafir body?). The Islamic ruling regarding this is a clear NO!

However, it is not permitted for an individual to perform Istijad on this topic, simply because they would not be authorized to do so. Since organ transplant of the Heart is a new development, say 1955 the Islamic jurists are not available to give a ruling concerting this issue simply because an Islamic World Government does not exist at present. It was desmantled in 1924 by the British and since that time the Muslims have had no unified leader or Islamic state to preside over such important issues. This is the missing formula that will provide protection to muslims as well as non-muslims worldwide for all problems new or old.

At present the abuse of organ transplantation cannot be emphasized enough. In India child hearts and vital organs are removed so that the wealthy families residing in western countries can prolong their son or daughters life at the expense of a human life for the lack of money or status. This abuse cannot be allowed. Since Secular democracy permits this form of premeditated murder, the Islamic World Government will not allow this to occur. The issue of organ transplant will be considered by the most prominent jurist both form a medical standpoint as well as from a social standpoint, always with the Qur'an as the source and Sunnah as guidance. This ruling can only be endorsed through an Islamic World Government and not individuals