The Myth of Indianism!

We look into whether india is a country like that stateted by so many Hindos, English men and the like. Or is it a contenent? And why is it in the interests of the Hindos and western hypocracy that it be viewed as a country!

The Myth of Indianism
Extracts from `Pakistan or Pastan-Destiny or Disintegration', 1950 by C.R.Ali

Surah 49:13 O mankind! We have created you from a male and a female, and made you into nations and
tribes, that you may know one another (not that you may despise each other)...

It is time to realise that the non-Indian nations, who comprise of Muslims, Dravidians, Akhoots*, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhs, and Parsis, are, and ever have been the victims of `THE MYTH OF INDIANISM'. That is, the Myth which teaches that `India' is `the country of India' and the exclusive domain of Caste Hindooism and Caste Hindoos. This has been built up by the Caste Hindoos, buttressed by British Imperialism and, thanks to our (muslims) own folly, believed by the world.

*Depressed Classes. The word `Akhoot' is derived rather irregularly from the Arabic root `Akh' meaning `brethren'. It is the opposite of the term `Achhoot', meaning Untouchable, which is used by the Hindoos for the depressed classes. I have coined this term to express the Muslim condemnation of the Hindoo use of the term `Achhoot' for the Depressed Classes, to symbolise the Muslim attitude towards them, and to impress upon them the Islamic creed of the universal brotherhood of man.

Past Record of the Myth
False in its origin and foul in its teachings, this Myth from the very beginning, has wrought havoc and
ruin to the cause of human freedom in the world. It has throughout the ages compromised the status of
Asia, distorted the history of Dinia, and degraded our people who have had the misfortune to live and
die in its sphere of influence.

Indeed, such is its evil spirit that, despite thirteen hundred years of Islamic rule, it has mentally enslaved
and socially enchained, nationally `minoritised', and territorially disinherited us all. Not only that, it has
frustrated our spiritual missions and perverted our civilisations, caged us in `India' and made `India'
herself a country of doom for all - the Indian as well as the non-Indian nations.

Present Role of the Myth
Nor has it stopped there. On the contrary, thanks to its priests and parasites, it has remained as active as
ever and is now busily engaged in sabotaging the revival and recognition of us all as nations. That is the cynical role which it is playing at present through its first believers, the Caste Hindoos, and
its latest beneficiaries, the British imperialists, who, in spite of their other differences, are co-operating
with one another to canonise it anew and to preach its fatal cult with a view to perpetuating its
stranglehold on us all in the Continent of Dinia.

First Fact

The vast and varied lands which are now commonly called the COUNTRY of `India', are, geographically as well as historically, a CONTINENT.

Geographically, what is the distinction between a `country' and a `continent' ? In terms of geography, whereas a country is just a fair-sized, politically demarcated area of land that possesses some individual characteristics: a continent is a huge, contiguous mass of land that is bordered by mountain chains or high seas, or partly by one and partly by the other. That is what in geography essentially distinguishes a `country' from a `continent'.

Now, if we open our atlases and, in the light of these broad, basic definitions, look at the map of `India',
we shall observe three outstanding facts and features.
The first is that `India' is an immense extent of land. In fact, in area it is at least equal to the whole
Continent of Europe, excluding Russia.

The second is that, in the north-east, north, and north-west, it is shielded by the highest mountain ranges
in the world; and, in the south-east, south, and south-west, its shores are washed by a vast ocean and
high seas.

The third is that `India' is divided from the Continent of Asia by barriers even more stupendous than those which separate the Continent of Asia from the Continents of Europe and Africa, or the Continent of North America from that of South America.

These three facts are conclusive in themselves; and, taken together, they prove that geographically, in
point of size, structure, and setting, `India' is a continent, not a country; that actually it possesses all the main characteristics of the continents of the globe; and that semantically, like Asia, Africa, North
America, South America, and Europe, it deserves to be termed and treated as a CONTINENT in itself.

So much for the geographical aspect of the fact that the `country' of `India' is a `continent'. What
of its historical aspect ? In terms of history, whereas a `country' means a respectable-size unit of territory that is, as a rule, uni-lingual, uni-cultural, uni-national, and uni-statal: a `continent' signifies an aggregation of such
territorial units and is, as a rule, multi-lingual, multi-cultural, multi-national, and multi-statal. In other
words, whereas the history of a `country' is, in general, that of one land, one language, one culture, one
nation, and one sovereign state; the history of a `continent' is, in general, that of many lands, many
languages, many cultures, many nations, and many sovereign states. That is the fundamental distinction
between the history of a `country' and of a 'continent'. Now, if in the light of this fundamental distinction we glance at any history textbook on `India', we shall
find that the history of `India' is definitely that of a `continent', NOT of a `country'.

The reason is that, like any other continent, though in its incidentals it is the history of a vast region,
inhabited by peoples possessing certain traits of physical affinity and living for a few short spells under
administrative unity; yet in its essentials it is the history of many separate countries which have, throughout the ages, been inhabited by many distinct peoples, with different languages, philosophies, and civilisations, and organised for the most part into sovereign states, ruled by their own kings or emperors.

This was the case in the twenty centuries (2000 years) of the Dravidian Period of the history of `India',
in the twenty-one centuries (2100 years) of the Hindoo-Period, and in the twelve centuries (1200 years)
of the Muslim Period. Indeed, in its essentials, it is much the same today after the 150 years of the
British period.

Under British rule, `India' became the designation of a State created for the first time in history and
included territories (such as Balochistan) and peoples who had never previously formed part of `India' at
any period of its history; but who have, on the other hand, from the dawn of history till the advent of the
British, possessed and retained distinct nationalities of their own.'

The fact that it is much the same today is all the more remarkable because, in the British period, the vast
resources of the Anglo-Hindoo Entente have been systematically employed to destroy the ancient
distinctions and divisions of `India'; yet their indestructibility is such that they have survived in their
entirety. The result is that, like any other continent, `India' remains as divided as ever. I mean divided
religiously and ideologically, linguistically, culturally, territorially and nationally.

Again, these facts which, in point of truth, are incontrovertible and, in point of time, cover no less than
fifty-five centuries (5500 years) of its history, prove that, historically, `India' is and ever has been in all but name a `continent'.

Such is the testimony of geography and history on the first supreme fact - a testimony which proves that
`India' is a `continent; not a `country'.

Source:
Pakistan or Pastan-Destiny or Disintegration', 1950 by C.R.Ali

Since it is clear that the Hindu administration in Hindia (India) as well as the Hindu population hold religous hatred against the Muslims, and that the Mushriks have occupied Muslim land much the same as the jewish Zionist entity in Palestine. What should the Muslim responce be in the region to the atrocities being carried out by the Hindu occupying forces?

Muslims must not be reactionary, they should respond by refering to Allah(swt) in ALL matters. In this situation the Muslims should defend themselfs even if this means killing those who are opressing them. They should preform Jihad since not doing so will anger Allah(swt). It should be pointed out that the calling of Jihad is normally carried out by the leader of the Muslim's kinown as the Khaleefah. In the abscence of a rightfull Khaleefah the Muslims must work together to impliment the Khilafah State so that Jihad can be called for. Since Muslims have no state and no real leader or army to help Jihad is therefore authorised and a Muslim can do anyhting he wants to the Kaffir or Mushrik where they are being persicuted or mamed. This is the absolute Islamic verdict on the subject matter. Its no point beating round the bush, Allah(swt) says in the Qur'an:

"Kill them where ever you meet them" and "Drive them out from wherever they drive you."

Problem: The Pakistani and Bagledeshi administrations have a Muslim duty to protect the lives of Muslims worldwide irrespective of whether they are Pakistani or Bangladeshi. The sad reality is that these nationalistic regims are only interested in their own patriotic people and have shown historically contempt for their own general populations throughout their short histories. In Pakistan the self elected dictator Musharaf made it publically clear that " The attrocities being carried out by Hindus is an internal problem for the Mushrik hindu administration in India and does not concern Pakistan".

I remember during the russian-Chechen conflict when I asked the Head of Police of the Punjab why the government was silent against the attrocities being carried out by the Kaffir upon the Muslim civilians of Chechneya he replied in the same manner - What a barstuard!

Solution: Muslims in Pakistan should begin revolting against the Pakistani self-appointed regime and topple it as soon as humanly possible. The same goes for Bangladesh and all other Muslim countries. How? The Muslims in the Indus region are permitted to carryout retalitory operations upon those hindu's who have commited acts against Muslims as commanded by Allah(swt). Muslims of Pakistan must assist Muslims in the indus and Kashmir regions by providing logistical, manpower and financial support. If the Pakistani Government interfers it too will be a legitiamate target for the Muslims since standing idle and looking the other way while inocent Muslims are being killed is not permitted for a Muslim - this is the action of a Kaffir!

Keep in mind that it is not permitted to kill every hindu you meet, only Hindu's who have carried out acts of violence or have killed Muslims are ligitimate targets - the reason for this is that not all Hindus think the same and hold religious hatred against ISLAM so Muslims must remain within the confines of Shariah Law where applicable. What about the law of the land? - Too Hell with it as Muslims do not follow the law of the land, they follow and abide by what has been reveled to them in the Qur'an and the Sunnah(saaw). Allah(swt) commands Muslims in the following,

"So judge between them by that which Allah has revealed" [TMQ Al-Maidah: 48].

When a Kaffir or Mushrik Hindo kills a Muslim its a tradgedy, when a Muslim kills a Kaffir or a Mushrik Hindo its an act of terrorsm.

This is part of a global plan of sedition to crackdown on sincere Muslim groups (once know by the west as freedom fighters) re-labeled as Terrorist cells that must be thwarted at all cost! Even the Pakistani Musharrif government is carrying out American foreign policy by rejuvinating the natinoalistic identity upon the masses by:

Did you know that the dispute between Pakistan and India over Kashmir is also one of resources? Water is the concern upon regional security! Their is no value shown for the lives of the people living in that region.

That their is a three way struggle between the State Administartion, Military and the Poeple? That the Musharraf Government wants a brother sister relationship with the Kaffir and Hindus while the Military is opposed to this and the poeple want the Muslim lands of Kashmir an India to be governed by ISLAM. That the State is governed by kaffirs and mushariks, the Army is dissolusioned and relise upon the UN and the Poeple of Pakistan are so demolorised that their understanding of Islam is becoming erroded each day!

The Government has planned further disolusionment of ISLAM by feeding the masses Kufr concepts.