
 
SADDAM
ARREST PART OF THE CRUSADE
AGAINST ISLAM:
The Reality on the Ground!

Introduction
PRESS RELEASE DATED 16TH
DECEMBER 2003
Following intense speculation regarding Saddam
Hussein’s arrest and his fate, there is
a need for us to understand what really happened.
However in order to come to the right conclusions
we need certain political foundations giving insight
into events occurring around the world both past
and present, such as the collapse of the Khilafah
in 1924 forming the basis of recent Muslim history,
since this was a milestone signifying the last
rule, solely in accordance with the Shari’ah,
on State level. In addition, we must bear in mind
how the kuffar (i.e. non-Muslims) have been conspiring
against Muslims throughout history, indeed the
struggle between Haq (truth) and Baatil (falsehood)
has always existed since the time of the Messenger
Muhammad (saw). It is also vital that any analysis
be from the perspective of the Qur'an and the
Sunnah of the Messenger Muhammad (saw) and his
prophecies i.e. that certain events will occur
prior to the Day of Judgment. This will shed proper
light on the global Christian Crusade, led by
the USA, against Islam and Muslims.
In view of the above, and for the following reasons,
we believe that Saddam Hussain was not in fact
arrested on Saturday the 13th of December 2003,
but at least 10 days beforehand:
1. It is not plausible for the CIA to bring someone,
of the significance of Saddam Hussain, straight
in front of the world’s media without having
interrogated him intensely first, which must have
been done over many days and even using the torture
and sense deprivation techniques that the USA
are now infamous for (from the treatment of prisoners
in Guantanamo Bay). Rather the delay in announcing
the capture of Saddam Hussain by George Bush was
timed to have the maximum impact for George Bush
personally, His government generally and future
plans for the region particularly. One element
of doubt is that when the announcement finally
came there were three conflicting reports about
where he was captured, for example one mentioned
the town of Tikrit although the ‘spiders
hole’ is not in Tikrit at all.
2. The announcement of Saddam’s capture
came a couple of days after penalties for Syria
had been announced and there was widespread discontent
among Americans that George Bush’s policy
in Iraq had failed: with the lack of any weapons
of mass destruction having been found and increasing
dead among the US soldiers from operations led
by the Mujahideen. Indeed US military maneuvers
have an historical habit of never being mentioned
when they occur, in order to gain strategic interests
and to try save face for US failures. In this
case the US had a policy leading to the control
of the whole of the Middle East, which had to
come out first.
3. The announcement by George Bush is in line
with foreign policy announcements linked to up-coming
elections and domestic policy failures. The US
public always judges their leaders on their foreign
policy successes and, in order to avoid being
ousted, as George Bush senior was, for his failure
to catch Saddam Hussain, George Bush junior ensured
that this Ace of Spades was played at just the
right time before Christmas and next years elections.
Clear gains against the Democrats are evidence
enough for this conclusion.
4. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar had just one day before
given an interview, aired on Al-Jazeera, other
Arab Channels, some US and Asian Channels, that
they were continuing to fight the US and he challenged
the US forces to permit journalists to broadcast
the real picture of the US failures in Afghanistan:
that in fact the US only had control of Kabul
and in reality the rest of the country was not
in their hands. Hence in order to cover up this
embarrassing situation the US made the most of
showing Saddam to the world’s media, giving
the false impression that they do not mind the
media presence in their war exploits.
5. The US were keen to link the capture to Islam,
Muslims and the so-called war against ‘Terrorism’.
This connection was obvious with talk of Saddam’s
beard, a clear Islamic symbol of a Muslim male
and the Taliban. This is totally in line with
their plea that they are fighting international
terrorism (which their allies interpret as Muslim
fundamentalist or Mujahideen). Psychologically,
the beard being shown before and then after it
has been shaved, together with Saddam being shown
on his prayer mat, is vividly intended to motivate
their own people, demoralize the enemy (i.e. Muslims)
and destroy the Islamic inspiration. Especially
when the supposed symbol of Muslim resistance
(i.e. Saddam) is amazingly caught in a spider’
hole. This despite the fact that George Bush himself
has been behind the massacre of many more millions
of people than Saddam Hussain, that Saddam Hussain
is known not to be a Muslim, that Saddam was found
without any guards despite numerous reports of
his ‘leading a resistance’ and the
fact that Saddam had enough wealth to hide in
luxurious surroundings as opposed to a hole in
the ground.
6. The link to a Christian victory against the
perceived infidels, akin to the crusades of old,
is the announcement just two days after the Christmas
festivities were begun in the US, rounding off
the Christian year with a victory for their Deen
against the Muslims and Islam.
7. The announcement came just after many pro-US
Iraqis had been killed and many Iraqi police had
resigned. This was so in order to inspire everyone
that 'we are winning the war' in Iraq because
Saddam has been caught. However, the truth is
that it was the Mujahideen who were fighting the
US and UK occupiers all along and their Jihad
will be much clearer now that the confusion caused
by Saddam’s presence has been removed. Although
the US tried to delay the announcement until the
Mujahideen had stopped or decreased the number
of their operations, since they were in fact increasing,
the US had no choice but to announce the capture
of Saddam with the excuse that the second man,
Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, is now leading the resistance.
Who has most likely already been caught by the
US as well! The truth is that the Mujahideen have
been carrying out wholesale bombing against the
occupiers: some 42 operations a day. These operations
are also ‘suicide’ ones, not a hallmark
of the Iraqis but rather those who want to trade
their life for paradise i.e. the likes of Al-Qaeda
and other Mujahideen.
8. With insurgency in Iraq at an all time high,
the Shia minorities persisting that they be given
a role and a lack of any alternative government,
now was the fittest time to announce Saddam’s
capture. Indeed only a few Shia traitors were
filmed celebrating, rather than the masses that
are in fact still condemning the US.
9. Just days before last Saturday, US officials
were talking about putting Saddam Hussain on trial
and they were even changing the law to try ex-members
of the Iraqi government. Common sense dictates
that they could not have found Saddam just after
this.
10. Only 10 days before last Saturday, the Mujahideen
had already announced that Saddam Hussain had
been captured by the US after heavy fighting involving
thousands of soldiers, although the Pentagon denied
this at the time. Even Saddam’s doctor stated,
after watching footage of his capture and treatment,
that it is impossible for Saddam Hussain to remain
subservient unless he had been heavily sedated
for some days.
In conclusion, the capture of Saddam Hussain by
the US is yet another charade intended to gain
ground against the enemy in a war they have all
but lost. Promised increased operations by the
Mujahideen will underline the fact that the war
in Iraq is and has always been one of Islam against
Kufr (i.e. non-Islam) and that Terrorism translates
for the US, UK and their allies as Islam and Muslims.
However, despite Bush’s antics news from
the Muslim camp is that victory has been promised
to the Muslims already by Allah (SWT) in this
life and the next – it is just a matter
of time before it is clear for all to see (Insha’allah).
As far as the future of Saddam is concerned Muslims
can only accept his trial, together with those
who have allied with the enemies (i.e. the US
and UK) against Muslims - by an Islamic Court
presided over of Muslim scholars and Mujahideen.
The crimes committed by Saddam and those who have
sold out Muslims, both inside and outside of Iraq,
must be assessed under the divine law of God and
the punishment carried out promptly and swiftly.
Any other verdict by the Taghout regime of Iraq
or any Taghout institution (e.g. an International
Court set up by the Taghout UN) will be rejected
and means nothing.
Source: http://www.muhajiroun.com/
21st Shawaal 1424 Hijri
15th December 2003 CE
Send us an email to confirm your thoughts
below, do you agree with this article?:
|